Author: The Chief Alchemist

  • How One IT Company Boosted Profits by 43% Without a Single New Client

    How One IT Company Boosted Profits by 43% Without a Single New Client

    What if you could boost profits by 43% without bringing in a single new client?

    That is exactly what happened with an IT service provider I worked with. They had not touched their prices in four years. Like a lot of businesses, they were stuck in a familiar rut, afraid to charge more and under constant pressure to compete on price. Their revenue had flatlined while costs kept rising. The owner told me in our first meeting: “We feel stuck. Every year we are working harder, but it never seems to get any easier.”

    In eight weeks, we raised their prices by 8%, cut their costs by 3%, and not one customer left. Here is exactly how we did it.

    The Silent Cost of Keeping Prices Flat

    For four years, this IT company left their rates untouched while their costs kept creeping up. Over that time they gave away nearly half their potential profit without even realising it.

    This is not unusual. Many service businesses make the same mistake, focusing on competing on price rather than pricing based on value. You keep prices the same hoping to keep clients happy. A competitor appears offering the same thing for less. You discount to win new business and avoid increasing prices for existing customers. Before long there is almost nothing left in your margins.

    The owner was cutting staff just to keep the business profitable. They were working longer hours for the same return. And the losses were invisible. Most clients never questioned invoices or asked for discounts. The problem was not the clients. It was the pricing.

    Why Clients Stay for Value, Not Price

    When we looked closely at the client base, something became clear. Customers were not staying because the price was low. They were staying because the service was good.

    Clients valued reliable systems, fast resolutions, and the peace of mind the company provided. Many had been with the business for years. Their service was tailored to each client’s industry and solved real problems. Price was not the main reason they stuck around. The value far outweighed the cost.

    By not adjusting prices to reflect that value, the company was missing the chance to reinvest in staff, better tools, training, and service improvements. The real cost of standing still was not just lost profit. It was the missed opportunity to build a stronger business, for the team and for the clients.

    When clients see you as a solution rather than a commodity, conversations shift from price to outcomes. That mindset change is what made everything else possible.

    The Psychology of Raising Prices

    There is work to do on the numbers when looking at any price increase. But that is not actually the hardest part. The hardest part is psychology. How you talk about the change shapes the perception your clients have of it entirely.

    The wrong way is to announce that prices are going up. That framing makes it about your costs, not their gains. It triggers resistance.

    The right way is to make it a conversation about value. We explained to clients: “To keep delivering these results and to add the new security features your business needs, we are making a small adjustment to your rate.” The conversation was always about future gains, not the company’s needs.

    Think of it like upgrading to premium economy. You pay more because you can see the value in extra leg room and better service, not just because the airline’s costs have gone up. The framing completely changes how the increase lands.

    How We Approached Each Client

    We did not apply a blanket increase across the entire customer base. We looked at each client individually: how long they had been with the company, how engaged they were, and how sensitive they might be to change.

    For each long-term client, instead of working out what it cost to support them, we focused on what mattered to that client. The hours saved every month. The downtime they had avoided. The peace of mind from not worrying about system failures. We pulled out real numbers showing how those outcomes translated into lower risk and higher productivity for their business.

    That gave the owner and their team confidence. They could see exactly how much value they were delivering compared to what clients were paying.

    We kept the adjustment in the high single digits and made sure every client understood exactly what they would gain. For some it was access to new technology. For others it meant stronger security or more responsive support.

    The response was striking. One client said: “I appreciate you improving your service every year and being upfront about what we are getting for the change. That is rare.”

    When you handle price changes as a conversation about value rather than a notice about costs, you keep trust intact. Clients feel invested in what comes next rather than resentful about what just happened.

    Where the Hidden Cost Savings Are

    Price is not the only lever that impacts your bottom line. There is often a second area that gets overlooked, and it played a crucial role in unlocking the full 43% profit jump.

    When most people think about improving profits, they focus entirely on revenue. But some of the simplest wins are hiding in everyday expenses.

    With this IT company, we started by digging into operational costs. The first thing we noticed was a pile-up of overlapping software subscriptions. They were paying for nearly 20 different tools: multiple project management platforms, several cloud storage providers, and a handful of security apps that all did more or less the same thing. By consolidating those subscriptions, we cut thousands of pounds each month from their outgoings without losing a single critical feature. The team had never realised how many of those small recurring costs had crept in over time.

    Vendor contracts were another area hiding savings. Some agreements had not been reviewed in years and usage had changed significantly since they were first signed. A quick round of renegotiations, in some cases just picking up the phone to ask for a pricing review, led to immediate savings. In a few cases, switching to a new supplier brought better service at a lower price.

    The lesson here is that loyalty does not always pay. Sometimes it just means you are overpaying.

    One of the most effective operational changes was moving to automated invoicing. The team had been spending hours each week manually sending invoices and chasing payments. By switching to an automated system, they cut billing time by 80% and saw clients pay faster, which gave their cash flow a real boost.

    None of these changes reduced the quality of service. If anything, they created more space for the team to focus on strategic work and better client support.

    Why Pricing and Cost Savings Multiply Each Other

    The combined effect of lower costs and streamlined operations meant every pound saved went straight to the bottom line. But the more important point is that these two levers do not just add up. They multiply.

    Once you have cleaned up costs, raising prices becomes easier and more impactful. You have more confidence in your margins. You can point to genuine investment in service quality. You can have the value conversation from a stronger position.

    The biggest jump in profit often comes from looking at what you already have, reviewing your prices, and trimming unnecessary costs. Most businesses overlook these basics. They are usually where the most hidden profit is found.

    Three Things This Case Study Proves

    First, clients will accept reasonable price increases when you tie them directly to value. Not because they have no choice, but because they can see what they are getting.

    Second, your biggest cost savings are probably hiding in plain sight. Overlapping subscriptions, unreviewed vendor contracts, and manual processes that could be automated are all quietly draining your margin right now.

    Third, when you combine smart pricing with operational efficiency, the results multiply. An 8% price increase and a 3% cost reduction delivered 43% more profit. Neither would have got there alone.

    If your prices have not changed in a while, or you are not regularly reviewing your expenses, you are leaving serious money on the table. The question is not whether you can afford to make these changes. It is whether you can afford not to.


    Take the free 5-minute Value Assessment: https://quiz.valuealchemists.com/artificial-intelligence

    Book a free 30-minute discovery call: https://value-alchemists.ninjapipe.app/book/value-alchemists/discovery-call

  • Why Most Service Businesses Are Undercharging (And Don’t Know It)

    Why Most Service Businesses Are Undercharging (And Don’t Know It)

    Here is an uncomfortable question. When did you last set your prices?

    If the honest answer involves checking what a competitor charges and shaving off 10%, you are not alone. And you are not being strategic. You are slowly making yourself poorer.

    Most service businesses in the UK are undercharging. Not by a little. The problem is not usually that owners do not care about profit. It is that they are using a pricing method that has nothing to do with the value they create. And by the time they notice, the damage is already done.

    The Race to the Bottom Trap

    Here is how it starts. You need to price a proposal. You look at what others in your space are charging. You pitch slightly below that to look competitive. You win the client.

    Then your competitor does the same thing. Then someone else does. Before long, everyone in the market is pricing off everyone else’s artificially low number, and the whole sector drifts downward together. That is not competition. That is a race to the bottom.

    Think about Dave and Sarah, two IT consultants in London. Dave drops his rates by 10% to win a client. Sarah panics and matches him. Within months, both are working twice as hard for half the pay. That is not strategy. That is self-sabotage.

    The deeper problem with competitor-based pricing is that it assumes your competitors know what they are doing. They do not. You have no idea what their cost structure looks like, whether they are actually profitable, or whether they are buying market share at a loss. Pricing by comparison is navigating by someone else’s map.

    Service businesses in competitive markets typically undervalue their work by 20 to 30% when using competitor-based pricing. But the financial gap is only part of the problem.

    Why Low Prices Attract the Wrong Clients

    When you compete on price, you select for a specific type of client. They chose you because you were cheapest. The moment someone cheaper comes along, they are gone.

    Price-sensitive clients are also the most demanding. They negotiate on every deliverable. They request revisions that were never in scope. They treat your expertise like a commodity because you have framed it as one. Your team spends more time managing expectations than doing the actual work, and burns out trying to meet unreasonable demands.

    Meanwhile, the clients who would genuinely value what you do and pay accordingly never see you as an option. Your pricing has already disqualified you in their minds.

    This is the part most business owners miss. Low pricing does not just reduce your margin. It shapes who you attract and who you keep. Get the pricing wrong and you build a client base that makes the business harder to run every single year.

    What Clients Are Actually Buying

    There is a more fundamental issue underneath all of this. Most service businesses price what they do rather than what it is worth.

    An IT support company charges for monitoring hours. A financial consultant charges for time spent on compliance tasks. A marketing agency prices by deliverable. The problem is that clients do not actually care about any of that. They are not buying hours or deliverables. They are buying outcomes.

    An IT support company is not selling server maintenance. It is selling business continuity and operational peace of mind. A financial consultant is not just crunching numbers. They are ensuring compliance and strategic clarity. A marketing agency is not selling social media posts. It is selling lead generation and business growth.

    It is like selling a drill when the customer really needs a hole. Once you focus on their actual need, price becomes secondary to the result.

    When you price the input, you invite clients to compare you on price, because that is the only dimension they can evaluate. When you price the outcome, you are having an entirely different conversation.

    How Value-Based Pricing Actually Works

    Switching to value-based pricing does not mean arbitrarily charging more and hoping for the best. It starts with a different question.

    Instead of asking what the market charges for this, you ask what the outcome of this work is actually worth to this specific client.

    If your cybersecurity service prevents a £50,000 data breach, that is the real reference point for your pricing, not what another MSP is charging per seat per month. If you are an engineering consultant, your client is not paying for technical drawings. They are paying for a project that gets approved on time and under budget. If you are providing IT services, your client is not buying monitoring hours. They are buying the assurance that their systems will not fail during critical business periods.

    The practical steps are these. First, understand the client’s actual problem, the real one, not the surface-level request. Second, map your service to the specific outcome it delivers. Third, quantify that outcome wherever you can. A number you can point to changes the conversation entirely.

    I have seen service businesses increase profits by 30 to 50% when they implement value-based pricing. That is not a small bump. It is a complete transformation of profitability and market positioning.

    What Changes When You Get This Right

    Value-based pricing builds stronger client relationships because it focuses on the client’s success, not just your effort. It also allows you to scale without working longer hours. A small effort that delivers big results should command a premium, not a discount.

    My clients typically see a 40% improvement in profitability on average, usually implemented within just three months. That improvement rarely comes from adding new clients. It comes from repricing the work they were already doing, work that was already delivering genuine value, just not capturing it.

    The business also becomes easier to run. Better pricing attracts clients who care about results rather than cost. Those clients are less demanding, more collaborative, and more likely to stay. The whole dynamic shifts.

    And it compounds. Better margin funds better people, better tools, and better delivery. Better delivery strengthens the case for the pricing. That is the opposite of the race to the bottom.

    One Thing to Do This Week

    Pick one current client engagement. Not a future proposal, a live project you are already delivering.

    Write down what the outcome of that work is actually worth to the client. Not what you charged. Not what it cost you to deliver. What it is worth to them.

    Then compare that number to your invoice.

    The gap will likely surprise you. And it is the first step towards building a more profitable business.

    Competitor-based pricing keeps you trapped in a race to the bottom. Value-based pricing positions you as an investment rather than a cost. The choice is not whether you can afford to change your pricing strategy. It is whether you can afford not to.


    Take the free 5-minute Value Assessment: https://quiz.valuealchemists.com/artificial-intelligence

    Book a free 30-minute discovery call: https://transform.valuealchemists.com/book/value-alchemists/discovery-call

  • This Is the Cheapest Year of AI You Will Ever See

    This Is the Cheapest Year of AI You Will Ever See

    I gave a talk recently at South Coast Technology Leaders called “Stop Chasing AI: Start Solving Problems.” One slide got more reaction than the rest combined. It made a simple point: the AI subscriptions you’re paying for right now are heavily subsidised, and that won’t last.

    If you’re experimenting with AI in your business, this matters. Not because you should stop, but because the assumptions you make today about cost are almost certainly wrong.

    The economics nobody is talking about

    OpenAI generated around $13 billion in revenue in 2025. In the same year, it spent close to $22 billion. That’s $1.69 spent for every $1 earned. Internal documents reported by the Wall Street Journal show the company expects operating losses of roughly $74 billion in 2028 alone, before turning profitable somewhere around 2030.

    Anthropic, which makes Claude, spent around $6.8 billion on compute in 2025 against total spending of $9.7 billion. That’s around 70% of every pound going on the infrastructure to train and run the models. The company is still running at a loss.

    These are the two biggest names in AI, and they’re both spending far more than they earn. That money has to come from somewhere, and right now it’s coming from investors prepared to bet that scale today equals dominance tomorrow.

    What that means for your monthly subscription

    Your £20 ChatGPT Plus, your £20 Claude Pro, your Copilot, your Cursor account. None of them reflect the real cost of running the models behind them.

    Take Claude Code, which a lot of developers use for writing software. A heavy user can easily generate $60,000 to $90,000 of actual compute cost in a year, against a subscription that costs around $2,400. The provider is absorbing that gap because they want you locked in. Once your workflows depend on the tool, switching becomes painful. That’s the bet.

    It’s the same playbook Uber ran with cheap rides, WeWork ran with cheap office space, and Amazon Prime ran with free shipping. Subsidise growth, build dependency, raise prices later.

    The signs are already there

    Anthropic has changed how it bills business customers, moving toward charging based on actual usage rather than flat fees. Rate limits have tightened across the major providers in 2026. Claude Code users have publicly complained about quotas running out faster than expected, and Anthropic’s own CEO has said the company is compute-constrained.

    OpenAI doubled the price of GPT-5.5 earlier this year. None of this is a crisis. It’s a slow recalibration toward something closer to real cost.

    Within 12 to 18 months, expect three things: free tiers will tighten, paid tiers will get more expensive, and pricing models will shift from flat subscriptions toward metered usage. The cheap, all-you-can-eat era is ending.

    What this means if you’re using AI in your business

    Two things matter.

    First, experiment now. This is the cheapest these tools will ever be, and the gap between what you pay and what you get is genuinely extraordinary right now. If you’ve been hesitating about trying AI in your business, hesitate less. You will never get more capability per pound than you do today.

    Second, design with cost in mind. The application of AI you build today might work commercially because the cost is artificially low. Ask yourself the harder question: would it still work if your AI bills doubled? Trebled? Went up tenfold? Because that’s not a hypothetical. That’s the trajectory.

    This is where most businesses are getting it wrong. They’re sprinkling AI on everything, often where it isn’t even the right tool.

    The RPA problem

    RPA stands for Robotic Process Automation. It’s been around for years. It’s the sort of automation that handles structured, repetitive tasks: copying data between systems, processing invoices, moving information through known workflows. It’s deterministic, which means it does the same thing every time. It’s auditable. It’s cheap to run.

    There’s a lot of business activity that genuinely doesn’t need AI. It needs RPA, or a script, or a rules engine. Things where the logic is stable and the inputs are predictable. AI is the wrong tool for those jobs. It’s slower, more expensive, and less reliable. You don’t need a language model to move a number from column A to column B.

    Where AI genuinely earns its place is the messy stuff. Reading unstructured information at scale, like contracts or support tickets. Letting non-technical staff query data in plain English. Spotting patterns in chaotic inputs. Summarising long documents. Drafting content that a human will review.

    The smart move is to use AI to build your automations, not to be your automations. Get Claude or ChatGPT to help you write the script, design the RPA workflow, or build the rules engine. Then let cheap, deterministic infrastructure run it day to day.

    McDonald’s learned this expensively. They ran a three-year partnership with IBM to put AI in the drive-thru, taking voice orders. It was a mess. Customers got 200 chicken nuggets they didn’t ask for. Bacon ended up on ice cream. Water turned into Coke. They quietly shut the whole thing down in July 2024. The truth is, that problem didn’t need AI. Better menu design and standard speech recognition would have done most of the job at a fraction of the cost.

    The opportunity that’s hiding in plain sight

    Here’s the part most people are missing. Because AI tooling is cheap right now, something has shifted underneath the surface.

    Three of my own clients are currently building things that wouldn’t have been viable two years ago. One is replacing a CRM that never quite fit the business. Another is cutting expensive licensing costs by building a custom platform from existing intellectual property. A third is building a multi-tenant system to sell their own approach to other businesses.

    None of these projects would have made commercial sense before. They’d have needed a £200,000 consultancy engagement and a year of build time. Now they’re being done by small in-house teams with help from Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot, in weeks rather than months, at a fraction of the historic cost.

    This is the genuinely interesting consequence of cheap AI. It’s not that AI is going to replace your developers, or your service business, or your job. It’s that the things you previously couldn’t afford to build are now within reach.

    If you run a service business, the bigger risk isn’t AI itself, it’s having an offer AI can easily copy. I dug into that in AI isn’t killing agencies, it’s exposing weak offers.

    If you’ve been quietly fed up with software that doesn’t fit how your business actually works, this is your window. Build the thing that does fit. Just design it knowing that the underlying AI costs will rise.

    What to do this week

    Three practical actions if any of this lands.

    One: look at where you’re using AI today and ask whether it would still be viable if your AI costs went up significantly. If the answer is no, you’ve got an economics problem coming.

    Two: look at where you’re using AI for things that RPA, scripts, or rules engines could handle better and cheaper. Move those off AI now.

    Three: look at the things you’ve wanted to build for years but couldn’t afford to. The maths might have changed.

    If you want to find out where your business sits on the spectrum from AI-vulnerable to AI-resilient, the assessment below takes about three minutes and gives you a personalised report.

    Could AI Replace Your Service Business?

  • AI Isn’t Killing Web Design Agencies. It’s Exposing the Ones With Weak Offers.

    AI Isn’t Killing Web Design Agencies. It’s Exposing the Ones With Weak Offers.

    I recently posted on LinkedIn about the pressure AI is putting on web design agencies. It generated a lot of discussion, and some of the responses were more interesting than the original post. So I wanted to go deeper on this, because there’s a bigger point here that matters well beyond web design.

    Let’s start with what prompted it.

    The £299 WordPress site is already under pressure

    There are web design agencies across the UK right now selling WordPress brochure websites from around £299. Some charge more, some less, but the point is that there’s a huge market of agencies whose core offering is: give us some money, we’ll build you a website.

    The problem is that AI website builders like Wix, Squarespace, Webflow, and a growing number of newer tools can now generate a complete, responsive site from a text description. In many cases, the result is perfectly adequate for a small business that just needs a functional online presence. The cost? Somewhere between free and £30 a month.

    That’s not a future scenario. That’s now.

    When I shared this observation on LinkedIn, the responses fell into some predictable patterns, and a few that were genuinely useful.

    The defensive response: “AI websites are terrible”

    Several web developers pushed back hard. The argument was essentially that AI-built websites are poor quality, have no real UX thinking behind them, and that the whole “agencies are doomed” narrative is overblown.

    There’s some truth in that. AI-generated sites can be generic. They don’t understand your brand the way a human designer does. The code isn’t always clean.

    But here’s what that argument misses: the quality bar for a basic brochure site is lower than most web professionals think. A local plumber doesn’t need a custom design system. They need a site that loads fast, looks professional enough, shows their phone number clearly, and has some decent reviews on it. AI can do that already, and it’s getting better fast.

    The defensive response is understandable. Nobody likes being told that what they sell is becoming commoditised. But denial isn’t a strategy.

    The people who confirmed it’s already happening

    More telling were the comments from people in the industry who shared real examples. One commenter described quoting against agencies selling basic websites for $500 to $800, only to find the same clients asking why they’d pay that when AI tools can generate something in 30 seconds.

    Another pointed out that hiring a developer for a brochure website will soon be a thing of the past, and that the focus needs to shift to outcomes, problem solving, expertise, and personal relationships.

    These aren’t predictions. They’re observations from people watching it happen in their own businesses right now.

    The real point: AI isn’t replacing agencies. It’s exposing weak offers.

    One comment summed it up better than I could: “This isn’t about AI replacing agencies. It’s about AI exposing weak offers. That’s a very different problem.”

    And that’s exactly right.

    If your web design agency sells “a WordPress website” as the product, you’re selling a deliverable. A thing. And when AI can produce a comparable version of that thing for a fraction of the cost, your pricing collapses. It doesn’t matter how good your code is, how clean your CSS is, or how many years of experience you have. If the client can’t tell the difference between your output and what AI produces, you have a positioning problem, not a quality problem.

    The agencies that will thrive are the ones selling something AI genuinely can’t replicate: strategic thinking about what the website needs to achieve, deep understanding of the client’s customers and market, conversion expertise, ongoing optimisation based on real data, and a trusted advisory relationship where the agency is a partner rather than a supplier.

    That’s the difference between selling ingredients and selling the meal. You can check out a service I provide called the Value Transformation Assessment that goes into this in more detail.

    The harder question: what about AI doing strategy too?

    One of the more challenging responses raised an interesting point. What happens when AI can plug into heatmaps and analytics, advise on why visitors aren’t converting, build strategy around commercial goals, and proactively adapt based on performance data?

    It’s a fair question, and the honest answer is that AI is already doing some of this. Tools exist that can analyse conversion paths, suggest layout changes, and run multivariate tests automatically.

    But there’s a distinction between analysis and judgment. AI can tell you that your contact page has a 90% bounce rate. It can even suggest changes. What it can’t do is sit across the table from your client, understand that their real problem is that they’re targeting the wrong customer segment entirely, and help them rethink their go-to-market strategy.

    The client doesn’t necessarily care whether you’re using AI tools in the background. They care about results. If you’re the person who helps them understand why their business isn’t growing and what to do about it, you’re a trusted partner. If you’re the person who builds them a website and sends an invoice, you’re a supplier who’s about to be replaced by software.

    The analogy that landed: Premier Inn vs The Dorchester

    Another commenter drew a useful comparison between functional purchases and emotional ones. A Premier Inn room does the job. It’s clean, consistent, and reasonably priced. The Dorchester is a different product entirely. You’re not just paying for a bed; you’re paying for the experience, the status, and the relationship.

    AI website builders are the Premier Inn of web design. They’ll do the functional job well enough for most basic needs. The question for agencies is: are you selling Premier Inn rooms and trying to charge Dorchester prices? Or have you genuinely built a Dorchester-level service?

    Most agencies are somewhere in between, and that’s the uncomfortable bit. They’re charging more than the AI tools but not offering enough differentiation to justify it. That middle ground is exactly where margins get squeezed the hardest.

    What this means if you run a web design agency

    If you’re reading this and recognising some of these patterns in your own business, here are a few things worth considering.

    First, look honestly at what you’re actually selling. If your proposals are structured around deliverables (homepage design, 5 inner pages, contact form, SEO setup), you’re selling ingredients. That’s the offer AI can undercut. Restructuring your proposals around business outcomes (increased lead generation, improved conversion rates, measurable revenue impact) changes the conversation entirely.

    Second, think about your client relationships. Are you a supplier who gets a brief, builds a thing, and moves on? Or are you a partner who understands the client’s business, tracks what’s working, and proactively advises on improvements? The first role is replaceable. The second isn’t.

    Third, consider your pricing model. If you’re still charging fixed project fees for website builds, every improvement in AI tools puts downward pressure on what you can charge. Retainer-based pricing tied to ongoing value, where you’re paid for the outcomes you deliver rather than the hours you work, creates a much more defensible business.

    And finally, stop seeing AI as the enemy. The agencies that will do best are the ones using AI to speed up the commodity parts of their work (initial layouts, first-draft copy, code scaffolding) while investing more time in the strategic, relationship-driven work that AI can’t do.

    It’s the same problem across all service businesses

    Web design agencies are just the most visible example right now because the AI tools are so tangible. You can literally watch an AI build a website in real time. It’s dramatic and it gets attention.

    But the same dynamic is playing out across every service business where the core offering can be described as a deliverable. IT support, bookkeeping, marketing, recruitment, consulting. If you can reduce what you do to a checklist of tasks, AI will eventually do those tasks cheaper and faster.

    The businesses that survive and grow will be the ones that have moved beyond deliverables to outcomes, beyond supplier relationships to trusted partnerships, and beyond cost-based pricing to value-based pricing.

    That’s not a comfortable message, but it’s an honest one.

    Want to know where your business stands?

    I’ve built a free assessment specifically for service businesses that want to understand how defensible they are against AI disruption. It takes about five minutes, and you’ll get an immediate score across four areas: replaceability, pricing resilience, supplier vs trusted partner positioning, and adaptability.

    No fluff, no sales pitch in disguise. Just an honest look at where you’re strong and where the gaps are.

  • 6 things every MSP should fix to improve profitability and business valuation

    6 things every MSP should fix to improve profitability and business valuation

    If you’re running an MSP and you’ve ever thought about improving your margins, or even considered what your business might be worth if you sold it one day, there are a handful of things that make an outsized difference.

    None of them are complicated. But most MSPs I work with aren’t doing all of them, and some aren’t doing any.

    Here are six that will move the needle.

    If you’d like a number to anchor this against before you start, our free MSP valuation calculator gives you an indicative valuation in about two minutes, based on the same factors covered below.

    1. Move away from break-fix

    This one comes first because it matters most.

    If the majority of your revenue still comes from ad-hoc break-fix support, it’s going to hold back both your profitability and your valuation. Buyers and investors want predictable, recurring revenue. They want to see a business that generates income whether or not something breaks on a Tuesday afternoon.

    Break-fix revenue is unpredictable by nature. It’s hard to forecast, hard to staff for, and it positions you as reactive rather than strategic. If you’re still predominantly break-fix, transitioning to managed services contracts should be your number one priority.

    2. Get customers onto annual (or longer) contracts

    Monthly rolling agreements are a step up from break-fix, but they’re not great for valuation purposes either. A buyer looking at your business wants to see committed, contracted revenue that’s going to stick around.

    The higher your percentage of clients on 12-month or longer contracts, the more predictable your revenue looks, both to a potential buyer and to your own cashflow planning. It also gives you a much stronger foundation for planning investments in your team and technology.

    If you’re nervous about asking clients to commit, consider this: most clients who are happy with your service won’t bat an eyelid at an annual contract, especially if there’s a small incentive to do so.

    3. Track support margins and project margins separately

    This is one of the most common gaps I see.

    Most MSPs have one set of accounts that blends everything together. Support revenue, project revenue, all the costs, one big number at the bottom. The problem is, you can’t tell whether your recurring support business is genuinely profitable on its own.

    And that matters, because when someone values your business, they’ll look at the recurring support revenue with a much higher multiple than project work. Project revenue is lumpy and unpredictable. Support revenue, if it’s profitable and growing, is where the real value sits.

    Separating these out doesn’t require a new accounting system. It just requires some discipline in how you allocate costs and report your numbers. Once you can see both margins clearly, you’ll make better decisions about where to focus, what to price, and what to fix.

    4. Know your per-customer profitability

    Not all customers are equal. Some are profitable, some are breaking even, and some are actively costing you money once you factor in the support time, the scope creep, and the constant back-and-forth.

    Most MSPs have never properly worked this out. They have a general sense of who the “difficult” customers are, but they haven’t put actual numbers against it.

    Until you do, you can’t make good decisions about pricing, retention, or where your team’s time is best spent. You might find that your largest customer by revenue is actually one of your least profitable. Or that a smaller client you’ve been neglecting is quietly delivering excellent margins.

    This is also where customer scoring becomes useful. By rating clients across factors like profitability, payment behaviour, cultural fit, and growth potential, you can make objective decisions about who to invest in, who needs a pricing conversation, and who might be better served by someone else.

    5. Stop selling a menu of services

    Too many MSPs present their services like a restaurant menu. Network monitoring, backup, helpdesk, security, cloud services, all listed out and priced individually. The client picks what they want, compares your menu to someone else’s, and chooses on price.

    That’s commodity positioning, and it kills your margins.

    Instead, package your services around the outcomes your clients actually care about. They don’t want “network monitoring” as an abstract concept. They want their systems to work reliably so their team can focus on their jobs. They want to know they’re protected and that someone competent is handling the technology so they don’t have to think about it.

    When you sell outcomes rather than ingredients, the price conversation changes completely. You’re no longer being compared line-by-line against a cheaper competitor. You’re being evaluated on the value of the result you deliver.

    6. Build in an annual price review process

    If you haven’t raised prices in two or three years but your costs have increased by 15-20% (salaries, licensing, tools, insurance, the usual), you’re effectively earning less every year. Your margins are being quietly eroded and most MSPs don’t even notice until it’s painful.

    Building an annual pricing review into your business isn’t just good practice, it’s essential. And communicating it properly makes all the difference. Give clients proper notice, explain what you’re investing in, focus on the value they continue to receive. Don’t apologise for it.

    Most clients expect annual increases. The ones who leave over a reasonable adjustment probably weren’t great clients to begin with.

    Where does your MSP stand?

    Most MSPs I work with are technically excellent. They deliver great service and their clients genuinely value what they do. But they’re competing as if they’re a commodity, because they haven’t addressed the positioning, pricing, and packaging issues that separate a good MSP from a premium one.

    Small changes in these areas can make a 30-50% difference to profitability. And if you’re ever thinking about selling, they can significantly increase what your business is worth.

    I’ve built a free 5-minute assessment that scores your business across five key areas: value positioning, pricing power, growth engine, operational leverage, and technology adoption. It’ll show you exactly where you’re strong and where you’re leaving money on the table.

    And if you’re an MSP with £500k+ in revenue and you already know you need to address some of these issues properly, the Value Transformation Assessment might be a better starting point. It’s a structured review of your business across ten dimensions, with specific recommendations and a clear implementation roadmap. It’s how most of my client projects begin.

  • Should you ever fire a customer?

    Should you ever fire a customer?

    As business owners, we often celebrate never losing a customer as a badge of honour. But what if I told you that a healthy amount of customer churn is actually essential for business growth?

    The Loyalty Myth

    I recently sat down with a business owner who proudly claimed, “We’ve never lost a customer.” Initially, this sounds impressive, a testament to exceptional service and client satisfaction!

    But as our conversation progressed, a different picture emerged.

    “Do you enjoy working with all of your customers?” I asked.

    “Well, we have a few that are quite difficult,” they replied hesitantly.

    “Do those customers take up a lot of your time?”

    “Oh, yeah, they’re the worst. The team can’t stand them. They’re always asking for free services or discounts, and nothing is ever good enough.”

    “Now, do you regularly increase prices for these customers?”

    “No,” they admitted. “They push back on everything. To be honest, I just can’t face the argument.”

    By the end of our discussion, we’d uncovered an uncomfortable truth, this business was holding onto customers who:

    • Were difficult to work with
    • Didn’t appreciate their services
    • Drained profitability (through resistance to price increases)
    • Tied up disproportionate team time
    • Damaged overall team morale

    The Value of Some Customer Churn

    Unless you’re extraordinarily lucky, you’ll never have 100% of customers who are a perfect fit. Customer relationships naturally evolve, their needs change, your business grows, key contacts move on.

    This is why having a structured approach to evaluating customer relationships is crucial. Some customer departures should be celebrated, not cried over.

    From Subjective to Objective Analysis

    The challenge most businesses face is the subjective nature of customer assessment. Different departments often have conflicting perspectives:

    • Sales sees the relationship one way
    • Service delivery another
    • Finance yet another

    What’s needed is an objective framework, one that transforms gut feelings into strategic decisions.

    Customer Scoring: The Objective Alternative to “You’re Fired!”

    Instead of dramatic confrontations, customer scoring provides a structured approach to relationship management. This system works in two crucial ways:

    Pre-Engagement Scoring

    Before working with new clients, establish clear criteria to assess whether they align with your:

    • Company culture
    • Work style
    • Service offerings
    • Budget expectations
    • Communication preferences

    This predictive tool can help you avoid problematic relationships before they begin.

    Post-Engagement Scoring

    Once relationships are established, use an ongoing scoring mechanism to track performance. Evaluate factors like:

    • Profitability
    • Client success and ROI from your services
    • Payment timeliness
    • Resource demands vs. revenue generated
    • Cultural alignment
    • Growth potential
    • Ease of working together

    Case Study: Turning Customer Attrition into Opportunity

    A global logistics client approached me with a serious problem—they were losing 35% of customers annually, significantly higher than the industry average of 20%.

    They initially believed the problem was in their customer service team. But when I examined the entire customer lifecycle, I discovered something different.

    They were primarily targeting American companies looking to expand into Europe. They had a super attractive offering and no shortage of customer willing to sign up.  However, there were too many clients leaving them after just 6 months.

    The problem was, many of the customers liked the idea of expanding into Europe but were not actually ready to do it. 

    By developing a customer scoring system that rated prospects on factors like:

    • Product fit for European markets
    • Prior third-party logistics experience
    • Language capabilities
    • Understanding of UK/EU regulations
    • Marketing plans for European customers

    …they could predict which clients would succeed and which would likely terminate services within six months.

    Rather than rejecting those low scoring clients outright, this scoring system enabled the company to develop a new service line, helping businesses prepare for successful European expansion. The result? Dramatically reduced attrition, improved customer satisfaction, and increased profitability.

    Creating Your Own Customer Scoring System

    Developing an effective scoring framework isn’t complicated, but it requires thoughtful consideration of what truly matters in your business relationships:

    1. Identify 5-8 key factors that define an ideal customer relationship
    2. Create a 1-5 scale for each factor
    3. Include criteria reflecting both sides of the relationship value exchange
    4. Score all existing clients quarterly
    5. Set threshold scores that trigger specific actions
    6. Apply the same criteria to prospective clients

    Handling Low-Scoring Customers

    When you identify customers with problematic scores, you have several options:

    Improve the relationship: Sometimes a frank conversation about expectations can transform things.

    Adjust your pricing: If a customer constantly pushes back on value, increasing prices can either lead to their departure (freeing resources for better-fit clients) or cause them to suddenly value your services more highly.

    Facilitate transition: Help them find another provider that’s a better fit while maintaining goodwill.

    Create a different service model: Develop a streamlined offering that better suits their needs while requiring fewer resources.

    The Freedom of Strategic Customer Selection

    Remember this crucial business truth: not all revenue is good revenue.

    The most successful businesses understand that customer selection is as important as customer acquisition. By implementing an objective scoring system, you transform what’s often an emotional, subjective process into a strategic one that benefits your business and team.

    After all, a customer who isn’t right for you probably isn’t getting the best service either. Sometimes, the kindest thing you can do is help them find a better match for their needs.

    Your team’s morale, your profitability, and even those customers themselves will ultimately thank you for making this difficult but necessary decision.

    If you’d like to put this into practice, our customer journey mapping and scoring work helps you build an objective framework for rating clients and deciding who to invest in, reprice, or move on from.

  • The 10 most common mistakes businesses make when communicating price increases (and how to avoid them)

    The 10 most common mistakes businesses make when communicating price increases (and how to avoid them)

    It’s no wonder that many businesses are afraid to increase their prices given that it can go wrong, damage your relationship or at worse lose you customers. . Here are some of the most common COMMUNICATION pitfalls and how to avoid them.

    What not to do:
    ❌ Surprising customers with no advance notice of price increases
    ❌ Failing to explain the reasons behind the price increase
    ❌ Using apologetic or defensive language when announcing increases
    ❌ Sending impersonal mass communications rather than tailored messages
    ❌ Not providing enough lead time before implementing new prices
    ❌ Failing to remind customers of the value they receive
    ❌ Using overly complex or technical language in price increase communications
    ❌ Not having a clear communication plan for different customer segments
    ❌ Failing to brief customer-facing staff on how to handle questions
    ❌ Not providing clear documentation of price changes

    Instead:
    ✅ Give customers at least 30 to 60 days’ notice, allowing ample time for budget adjustments
    ✅ Clearly explain price increase reasons, enhancing services, or new quality improvements
    ✅ Use confident, factual language, position increases as necessary for continued excellent service
    ✅ Personalise communications for customer segments, tailor messages to their specific needs and value
    ✅ Implement a two-stage communication process, warn first, then confirm with specific details
    ✅ Remind customers of the full value package, highlight all benefits and improvements over time
    ✅ Use clear, straightforward language, avoid jargon and clearly state the new pricing
    ✅ Create segment-specific communication plans, different approaches for premium vs standard customers
    ✅ Thoroughly brief all customer-facing staff, provide scripts and objection handling training
    ✅ Provide comprehensive documentation, create FAQs if necessary

    Remember, price increases don’t have to cost you customers. When communicated properly, they can actually strengthen your relationships by demonstrating how you are continuing to invest in your service and are a safe partner for them in the long term.

    How has your business handled price increase communications?

    Before you plan your next increase, it’s worth knowing how far behind your prices have fallen. Our Pricing Health Check gives you that picture in a couple of minutes.

  • How NOT to announce a price increase to your customers

    How NOT to announce a price increase to your customers

    This was an email I received from a hosting provider.

    The tone is apologetic and they don’t make any effort to talk about the value they have delivered or will be in the coming year other than a vague reference to improving infrastructure.

    Second half of a price increase email from a web hosting provider

    I appreciate that their costs have gone up, along with everyone else’s but with a little more effort they could have taken this opportunity to communicate the wide range of products and services they offer and their planned roadmap for the year. It would even be a chance to upsell additional services.

    Suffice to say I am not with them now and I am instead paying considerably more with another provider but one who I feel is delivering more value.

    For a much better example of how to word a change, check out this one from Amazon,

    And if you haven’t put your prices up for some time, use this handy calculator to see what your price should be based on just UK average inflation.

    Price Inflation Calculator

    For a fuller picture of where your pricing stands, our Pricing Health Check goes beyond inflation to show how much margin you may have quietly given away.

  • How Amazon generated $2 billion of additional revenue in 1 year without raising prices

    How Amazon generated $2 billion of additional revenue in 1 year without raising prices

    There are good ways and bad ways to communicate changes to your pricing or service. This is an example of a well managed one from Amazon in January 2024 that you may well have received yourself.

    Lets break it down,

    Start of email from Amazon about change to service
    price change notice from Amazon prime

    They make it clear what the change is and why they are making it. They stress the value early on in terms of how it will enable them to continue investing in their content.

    They also play down the negative impact of this change on customers by comparing how they will have fewer ads compared to other streaming platforms.

    They also provide the upsell option where you can keep your existing service and remove the new ads by paying an additional £2.99 a month.

    Next they reinforce the value and everything that you get in the service to remind you just how good it is,

    Middle part of a price increase letter from Amazon about their Prime service which highlights the services you get bundled into the package.
    Amazon Prime service notice, highlighting the great value

    And finally they wrap it up with the following,

    Final part of an Amazon Prime service change email sent to all customers.

    They clarify that there is no action required and also give another gentle push towards their ad free additional subscription.

    They made this change in January 2024 and in that year alone they generated over $2 billion in Prime Video related revenue.

    Amazon knew that their customers (including myself) might not be happy about the ads but they also knew that customers love the convenience of next day deliveries and all the other parts of the Prime service.

    This meant that they had very little risk of losing a significant percentage of customers and any losses would easily be offset by the increased revenue.

    They also provided an upsell to at least give those customers who are really upset about the ads a way to avoid them, albeit at an additional cost.

    The reality is that Amazon were actually degrading the customer experience to develop a new revenue stream. They way they positioned it though was extremely well done and by focusing on the value they are delivering they avoided any significant customer push-back.

    Wondering whether your own prices need a similar adjustment? Our Pricing Health Check is a quick way to see how far your margins have drifted while costs have risen.

  • Are you driving your business whilst only looking in the rear view mirror?

    Are you driving your business whilst only looking in the rear view mirror?

    Unless you are reversing, you wouldn’t try and drive your car whilst only looking in the rear view mirror would you? SO why do so many business owners drive their businesses in this way when it comes to performance metrics (KPI’s).

    The Backwards-Looking Trap

    I recently responded to a friends post about KPIs, and it sparked a thought: why do so many small and medium-sized businesses focus exclusively on lagging indicators like revenue and margins?

    The issue with this approach is glaring—these metrics show you what’s already happened. They’re historical data points that you simply cannot change. While they’re certainly important to track, they represent only half of the performance picture.

    A Complete View Requires Two Perspectives

    To effectively steer your business, you need both lagging AND leading indicators. Think of it this way:

    Lagging indicators are your rear-view mirror—they show what’s already happened. These include:

    • Quarterly revenue figures
    • Profit margins
    • Customer retention rates
    • Cost of goods sold

    They’re excellent for confirming whether your strategies worked, but they only tell you about the past.

    Leading indicators are what you see through the windscreen—they show what’s coming next and allow you to anticipate when to change direction, accelerate, or brake. These include:

    • Website traffic trends
    • Quality of your sales pipeline
    • Customer engagement metrics
    • Pre-booked consultations and meetings
    • Proposal conversion rates

    These forward-looking metrics give you early warnings of potential problems or confidence that you’re on the right track.

    The Value of Looking Forward

    Surprisingly, most businesses fixate only on the rear-view mirror. This backward-looking approach limits your ability to make proactive decisions about pricing, cost management, and value delivery—the very levers that most significantly impact profitability.

    When you incorporate leading indicators into your business dashboard, you gain the ability to:

    1. Anticipate market shifts before they affect your bottom line
    2. Adjust pricing strategies proactively rather than reactively
    3. Identify cost-saving opportunities before they become urgent necessities
    4. Recognise shifting customer preferences while there’s still time to adapt

    Balancing Your View

    You absolutely need to know where you’ve been—historical performance provides essential context and confirms whether your strategies are working. But more importantly, you need to know if you’re heading in the right direction.

    The businesses that thrive are those that maintain this balanced perspective. They acknowledge past performance while prioritising the indicators that give them control over their future.

    Next time you’re reviewing your business metrics, ask yourself: “Am I spending as much time looking through the windscreen as I am checking the rear-view mirror?”

    Pricing is one of those forward-looking levers worth checking regularly. If you want a quick read on where yours stands, try our Pricing Health Check.

    You can join the discussion about this topic on LinkedIn here